The use of genomic information is becoming a key piece of the oncology toolkit to make informed decisions aimed to improve the management of the disease and increase the cost-effectiveness of available therapies. Although in recent years the relevance of many oncogenic alterations in malignant transformation has been identified and validated across cancer types, the relevance for cancer growth of most alterations in a patient’s tumor are still of uncertain significance and their usefulness to inform the most appropriate treatment is unclear. Furthermore, mounting experimental and clinical data on tumor alterations driving the disease and influencing the response to anti-cancer therapies is currently gathered across scattered and fragmented resources, annotated with dissimilar approaches and with no easy framework to match the knowledge they store with the alterations observed in a patient’s tumor. These problems severely limit the value that the genomic information of a tumor individual provides beyond the well-known biomarkers of drug response.
We are proud to announce the brand new version of the IntOGen Somatic Mutations Analysis (IntOGen SM) pipeline. We call it version 2.0.0 as it has been completely rewritten from scratch with a strong focus on quality, efficiency and scalability.
The IntOGen SM pipeline addresses the challenge of identifying which somatic mutations are important for the development of tumors. The input for the analysis is a list of somatic mutations detected in a cohort of tumors. Read the rest of this entry »
I have recently seen several presentations by groups that systematically explore alterations in cancer genomes that deliver the same message. One of the main challenges faced by their projects is to identify genes and pathways involved in tumor development (drivers). Very good methods based on the recurrence of somatic mutations have been developed to identify cancer drivers (see, for example MutSig and the Significantly Mutated Gene (SMG) test from MuSiC). They rely on the assumption that genes that exhibit more mutations than expected by chance are putative drivers. Even though these methods are successful in identifying clear cancer drivers, they also face some known challenges. For instance, the background mutation rate is hard to estimate accurately and important genes that are mutated only in a small number of tumors may be overlooked. Besides, these methods treat all mutations that may affect protein sequence equally, when their impact on protein function clearly differ.
Some time ago we thought that a good way to address these challenges would be to use the Functional Impact Bias (FM bias) observed in genes across a cohort of tumor samples. In other words, we wanted to estimate how the accumulation of mutations with high functional impact on each gene deviates from the average observed in all tumor samples.
When we created IntOGen we had the motivation to convert it into a discovery tool for cancer researchers and a resource that integrates multidimensional OncoGenomics Data. We have now made a new important step in IntOGen project: we have included all somatic mutations detected by the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) projects. Read the rest of this entry »
Our article on a Consensus deleteriousness score of missense Single Nucleotide Variants was published yesterday online and will be included in the April issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics. We want to invite you to read it, and give you a glimpse at how we got the idea. Read the rest of this entry »